by John M. Frame In 1961, Cornelius Van Til reviewed a book by R. H. Bremmer called Herman Bavinck als Dogmaticus (Herman Bavinck the Theologian).l Having run across this review in a recent perusal …
Van Til: His Simplicity and Profundity
by John M. Frame Our Orthodox Presbyterian Church is a small body and has little influence in the world or even in the worldwide Christian community. For its size, however, it has had as …
Continue Reading about Van Til: His Simplicity and Profundity →
Van Til: A Reassessment
by John M. Frame I have written a book on Cornelius Van Til, which will be published this year, Lord willing, by Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co. The book is a sympathetic, critical …
Van Til on Antithesis
by John M. Frame As we seek to make the best use of Cornelius Van Til’s thought in our own time, it is especially important that we come to grips with his concept of antithesis, the diametrical …
Van Til and the Ligonier Apologetic
by John M. Frame R. C. Sproul, John Gerstner, and Arthur Lindsley, Classical Apologetics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984. x, 364. $12.95). A review article originally published in Westminster …
Continue Reading about Van Til and the Ligonier Apologetic →
The Regulative Principle: Scripture, Tradition, and Culture
An Email Debate Between Darryl Hart and John Frame Note, 2006 (JF): In 1998, some students organized an email debate between Darryl Hart, then librarian at Westminster Theological Seminary in …
Continue Reading about The Regulative Principle: Scripture, Tradition, and Culture →